***Post a MEME Thread***

42ce22bd64bbaaa0b776e5898d33a620.png

Fuck Yeah!!!
Don’t tease us … that’d be great
 
Well, sure, if the cancer is simple and only a lumpectomy, maybe with radiation is needed, then they will be a large portion of the number living longer without chemotherapy. However, if the cancer is aggressive or already metastatic, then chemotherapy is required. Chemotherapy is for those that are already defined as much more seriously ill, so it’s not surprising more are dying. On the surface, this looks like schlock “science”.

It’s similar to the lay publication that compared:
-smokers
-non-smokers
-people who smoked then quit

They found that people who never smoked had the lowest incidence of lung cancer, smokers had more, but smokers who quit had the most of all. Conclusion, if you smoke, don’t quit.

Fucking stupid. They didn’t look at the reasons people quit. A very large percentage of those who smoked, then quit, quit because they had developed serious symptoms that motivated them to do so, especially including early stage lung cancer.
 
Back
Top