Nice Racks Awesome Tits

4f41ab98bc8d4dd950c54c0eaa5394cc8ca6ff63.gif
 
bowtie hog said:
we will see who call's her a cartoon.
7420146-my-russian-babe-00419-3789476353-photo-of-nude-beautiful-russian-w_880x660.jpg
Click to expand...
I know that YOU are not an idiot but just to make sure, you DO know the difference between a real woman and a computer generated image, right?
It isn't just the hands and eyes that give it away when it is a fake. It is the blurry background, the rubbery skin and in the case of images with letters and words, obvious misspelled signs.
I do thank everyone that takes the time to post pictures of great looking women but these fakes are on par with an electric car with fake exhaust sounds.
It is my opinion of course but I'm not the only one that feels this way.
 
Kd,i understand what you're saying and god knows im not a photgraphy expert at all,but my question is,when focused on a subject,will the background not be fuzzy anyway?
 
Dusterdude said:
Kd,i understand what you're saying and god knows im not a photgraphy expert at all,but my question is,when focused on a subject,will the background not be fuzzy anyway?
Click to expand...
Very well can be. It’s common in portraiture to use medium to long lenses with a relatively large aperture which throws the foreground and background out of focus. In that particular photo, the thing that looks most like AI to me is her skin texture but some photo software smoothing filters could give a similar effect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top