BOSS#1540
Silver Member
Then it'll probably be fine, especially if its a proven combo.That's odd. I was told 1.52hp/ci is easy. It's the reason I bought what I bought
Then it'll probably be fine, especially if its a proven combo.That's odd. I was told 1.52hp/ci is easy. It's the reason I bought what I bought
600hp n/a small block street car is old news now in the LS world.
@BOSS#1540
8000rpm shifts with oe ls2 rods and even rod boltsAnd it's still running 100% fine
Don't take this vid too seriously as i had to peddle it in 1st as i forgot to air down the hoosiers and it spun bad all through 1st
via BitChute.com
For comparison, here are flow numbers for SBF AFR 220’s
![]()
You could have told me an hour ago and I would have forgotten by now!Good guess, you already knew, lol.
1-3/4" headers to fit foxbody. 3300lbs with me. Ran 11.7 at 125.4 mph, lol. I was leaving at an idle to not bust shit.
It dynoed 583hp, 503ft/lbs but i had a better intake and oil pan on it at the track.
I was happy after dyno. Very happy with it on the street. Buddy that helps me now says something wrong with that dog.
Lots to be said about having the right combo.
The reason I say that is because years ago I went on Drag Week with a friend of mine.Hey!![]()
Is now a good time to say flow numbers don't matterOne thing I find odd about weingartners flow tests..
The AFR 205s flow better than the afr220s on his machine except in 2 places, the .500 and .600 lift flow numbers.
Speaking of numbers, the promaxx heads on average (.200 to .600) are within 6 cfm on intake. The exhaust is where the afr's kick the shit out of the promaxx, 18 more cfm average.
But this is comparing the promaxx as cast vs cnc afr's, so really they are pretty fuckin good castings, but I wonder why the exhaust performs so poorly
Do the afr heads have raised exhaust ports or are they in stock location?One thing I find odd about weingartners flow tests..
The AFR 205s flow better than the afr220s on his machine except in 2 places, the .500 and .600 lift flow numbers.
Speaking of numbers, the promaxx heads on average (.200 to .600) are within 6 cfm on intake. The exhaust is where the afr's kick the shit out of the promaxx, 18 more cfm average.
But this is comparing the promaxx as cast vs cnc afr's, so really they are pretty fuckin good castings, but I wonder why the exhaust performs so poorly
Is now a good time to say flow numbers don't matter
I think it'll have a very nice tq curve. If you can call a straight line a curve![]()
Do the afr heads have raised exhaust ports or are they in stock location?
One thing I find odd about weingartners flow tests..
The AFR 205s flow better than the afr220s on his machine except in 2 places, the .500 and .600 lift flow numbers.
Speaking of numbers, the promaxx heads on average (.200 to .600) are within 6 cfm on intake. The exhaust is where the afr's kick the shit out of the promaxx, 18 more cfm average.
But this is comparing the promaxx as cast vs cnc afr's, so really they are pretty fuckin good castings, but I wonder why the exhaust performs so poorly
Raised exhaust ports vs stock location?
Stop looking at fucking youtube and weingartner's and vizard's and others bench racing dick pulling vids and listen to the people with already running fast cars. They all told you to buy AFR 220's or Trickflow raised ports. And you ignored them and now you are complaining that it won't make enough HP.... fucking hell @Steve439![]()
Steve439 is just messing with you 'cause you keep bringing up LS motors in a SBF thread.
He has thousands of dollars in his motor, he's not going to put it in a dumpster and buy an LS.
Ah, I noticed all the deletesDon't worry, he typically goes back and deletes his posts after an ls bender. The post numbers all line up again..
It's not the engine platform that's the problem. It's the builder.